Research notes

How I examine model evidence.

A practical framework for distinguishing a model score from evidence that supports an intended use.

01

Data and independence

What produced each observation? Which samples share a person, source, time period or collection process? Decide what must be kept separate before choosing a split.

scikit-learn: cross-validation ↗

02

A fair comparison

Choose a baseline, isolate the change being tested and keep final evaluation separate from model and preprocessing choices. Fit learned transformations on the appropriate training data.

scikit-learn: common pitfalls ↗

03

Useful measures

Read aggregate scores alongside class-level errors, uncertainty and the cost of mistakes. Ask whether the metric actually represents the question the system is intended to answer.

scikit-learn: model evaluation ↗

Different outputs need different evidence.

Visible expression is not internal emotion

A facial-expression classifier learns dataset labels. Claims about a person’s internal state need a different evidential basis.

Segmentation quality is not downstream value

The MSc work separates boundary quality, cell measurements and prediction. Improvement in one does not automatically establish improvement in another.